matetip.com

tips for contemporary living

Gay Dog Saved by Facebook

Gay Dog Saved by Facebook. This dog was handed over to the Jackson Rabies Control Animal Shelter in Tennessee yesterday after its owner saw it mounting another male dog and assumed that it was gay.

UPDATE: The shelter confirms that the dog has been adopted.

This dog was handed over to the Jackson Rabies Control Animal Shelter in Tennessee yesterday after its owner saw it mounting another male dog and assumed that it was gay.

The pit bull/American bulldog mix was scheduled to be euthanized at 1:00 p.m. today until word of his plight was posted to Facebook. The “Jackson Madison Rabies Control Stalker,” a woman who uploads images of shelter dogs to her account in the hopes of finding owners to adopt them, posted this message yesterday:

This guy was signed over to RC, not bc he’s mean or bc he tears things up, but because… His owner says he’s gay! He hunched another male dog so his owner threw him away bc he refuses to have a “gay” dog! Even if that weren’t the most assinine thing I’ve ever heard, its still discrimination! Don’t let this gorgeous dog die bc his owner is ignorant of normal dog behavior! He’s in kennel 10L and he WILL be put down tomorrow bc there is no room at the inn!


More than 4,000 people shared the post overnight. Men and women from across the United States volunteered to adopt the dog or pay for him to be moved to a no-kill shelter.

More than 4,000 people shared the post overnight. Men and women from across the United States volunteered to adopt the dog or pay for him to be moved to a no-kill shelter.

Rescue group “Saving the Animals Together” posted on Facebook Thursday morning that the dog was safe, although they clarified that the individual who adopted the animal was not associated with their organization:

Rescue group "Saving the Animals Together" posted on Facebook Thursday morning that the dog was safe, although they clarified that the individual who adopted the animal was not associated with their organization:

This is the woman who reportedly rescued the pup:

This is the woman who reportedly rescued the pup:
Accordingly to http://www.buzzfeed.com/ellievhall/gay-dog-saved-from-execution-by-facebook-campaig.
gaydog
BUT does it makes any sense to think that there is a sexuality other than sex in the nature? We don’t think so. Dogs have always shown interest in having sex. Period.

 

The making of a homosexual

While some researchers examine what benefits animals may derive from same-sex sexual activities, others are trying to pinpoint straightforward biological causes of the behavior. They find that dosing pregnant animals with certain hormones greatly increases the mothers’ odds of producing homosexual offspring and that among fruit flies, a genetic mutation leads male flies to choose other males (SN: 12/14/96, p. 373).

Animal experiments also reveal that castrating males or giving them drugs to inhibit their production of the enzyme aromatase causes them to fancy members of their own sex, Viveka Mansukhani and her colleagues at Cornell University explain in the December Hormones and Behavior. Testosterone or estradiol treatments make females likely to consort with other females.

In their study, Mansukhani and her coworkers tampered with the sexual orientation of animals that choose one mate for life — a group whose sexual preferences have drawn little attention from other researchers. They gave female zebra finches estradiol during their first 2 weeks of life, then put them in either all-female or coed cages for up to 100 days. Next, they gave them testosterone and observed their mate preferences.

In environments intended to replicate a natural colony, the female birds that grew up in unisex housing were more likely to prefer females than were those in the coed group, they report. As juveniles, the birds may need to see males in order to learn to choose them as mates, speculates coauthor Elizabeth Adkins-Regan.

Because of the great importance of having a partner and the finite supply of males in cages, some captive female zebra finches select a same-sex companion even without any hormone treatments, says Adkins-Regan. In cages, “there’s always a chance that they may get left out — that nobody wants them,” she says. In the wild, they can usually go in search of other males to court and probably don’t hook up with females.  by TINA ADLER in Animals’ Fancies


PetAlive Natural Remedies for Pets

 

AS Jonah Lehrer puts it  :

Male big horn sheep live in what are often called “homosexual societies.” They bond through genital licking and anal intercourse, which often ends in ejaculation. If a male sheep chooses to not have gay sex, it becomes a social outcast. Ironically, scientists call such straight-laced males “effeminate.”

Giraffes have all-male orgies. So do bottlenose dolphins, killer whales, gray whales, and West Indian manatees. Japanese macaques, on the other hand, are ardent lesbians; the females enthusiastically mount each other. Bonobos, one of our closest primate relatives, are similar, except that their lesbian sexual encounters occur every two hours. Male bonobos engage in “penis fencing,” which leads, surprisingly enough, to ejaculation. They also give each other genital massages.

As this list of activities suggests, having homosexual sex is the biological equivalent of apple pie: Everybody likes it. At last count, over 450 different vertebrate species could be beheaded in Saudi Arabia. You name it, there’s a vertebrate out there that does it. Nevertheless, most biologists continue to regard homosexuality as a sexual outlier. According to evolutionary theory, being gay is little more than a maladaptive behavior.

(…)Darwin’s theory of sex has been biological dogma ever since he postulated why peacocks flirt. His gendered view of life has become a centerpiece of evolution, one of his great scientific legacies. The culture wars over evolution and common descent notwithstanding, Darwin’s theory of sexual selection has been thoroughly assimilated into mass culture. From sitcoms to beer ads, our coital “instincts” are constantly reaffirmed. Females are wary, and males are horny. Sex is this simple. Or is it? 

As in

http://www.salon.com/it/feature/1999/03/…
http://www.seedmagazine.com/news/2006/06…
http://rockhawk.com/Gay%20Animals.htm
http://www.sciencenews.org/pages/sn_arc9…

http://www.buzzfeed.com/ellievhall/gay-dog-saved-from-execution-by-facebook-campaig


Learn about PetAlive natural remedies for pets!

Best Countries to live in 2013: Immigration Tips for a better life

Best Countries to live in 2013

America, where babies will inherit the large debts of the boomer generation, languishes back in 16th place. Despite their economic dynamism, none of the BRIC countries (Brazil, Russia, India and China) scores impressively. Among the 80 countries covered, Nigeria comes last: it is the worst place for a baby to enter the world in 2013. The Economist explains

 


AVG AntiVirus 2013

As Laza Kekic: director, country forecasting services, Economist Intelligence Unit puts it: Boring is best

Quibblers will, of course, find more holes in all this than there are in a chunk of Swiss cheese. America was helped to the top spot back in 1988 by the inclusion in the ranking of a “philistine factor” (for cultural poverty) and a “yawn index” (the degree to which a country might, despite all its virtues, be irredeemably boring). Switzerland scored terribly on both counts. In the film “The Third Man”, Orson Welles’s character, the rogue Harry Lime, famously says that Italy for 30 years had war, terror and murder under the Borgias but in that time produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci and the Renaissance; Switzerland had 500 years of peace and democracy—and produced the cuckoo clock.

However, there is surely a lot to be said for boring stability in today’s (and no doubt tomorrow’s) uncertain times. A description of the methodology is available here: food for debate all the way from Lucerne to Lagos.


Teach English Abroad

The talk around (all kind of talk) : Scandinavia Versus  America Versus Africa Versus UK Versus Australia

emigration3
In Viino Veritas
05:54 AM on 12/14/2012

As a Scandinavian it is both funny, scary and fascinating to listen to the delusion among the vast majority of Americans. You just have a really big army guys and that basically all you have, and that’s not really something to be proud of. You’ve got homeless people in scary numbers and 3 millions people incarcerated a crime-level which is a joke and guns everywhere. The Intelligence Quotient of your citizens is frighteningly low, and the level of religion is ridiculously high – you guys are still in the dark ages in so many fields and the bulk of you are to arrogant and ignorant to even begin to realize it. YOU ARE MONKEYS WITH NUKES. The reason you are against socialism is because you’ve been manipulated to be against it. And don’t even get me started on Fox News. The strategy of your leaders is to keep you stupid enough to not realize the freak-show of your own society – and if it provokes you to hear it from a smug inhabitant of the scientifically measured happiest country on this planet (Denmark) then go to Youtube and check out what a very wise american by the name of George Carlin has to say about the matter. Please wake up soon, it’s unbearable to behold for much longer.

JasonWS

Lovely day for a good plan
08:39 AM on 12/14/2012

You miss the truly amazing thing by lumping us all together. Even with 46% of our population tied like the proverbial hand behind our back, we’re still able to do some fairly impressive things. Despite budget cuts and a variety of difficulties, we still put Curiosity on Mars. We may not have the impressive CERN Hadron collider, but we are coming out of a dark and difficult age. Remember when the Soviet Union collapsed and Russia had their downturn and brief resurgence before their own recent misfortunes? That’s actually where the United States is poised. Do we have significant problems to overcome? Sure, but legalizing Marijuana could possibly end incarceration for 1/8th of all of our inmates. Do we have severe financial and diplomatic issues to resolve? Of course, but so does the twice our size European Union and the 4 times our size China. If our waitresses don’t want to be waitresses anymore, at least one of them makes a bakery in her home and starts selling gluten free pies. If a software developer can’t stand going through the normal college process, he founds Microsoft, or Apple, or Facebook. We are monkeys or apes rather, even if 46% of our population doesn’t believe in evolution. But we’re trying to be better, while you’re just trying to push others down. 

In Viino Veritas
07:41 AM on 12/15/2012

…not trying to push you down, but rather to wake you up by a friendly slap in the face. I quite like your answer and I think you have a point. Many great things have come from the U.S. not just greedy corporations but also artists and philosophers. My point is that the Americans in the clip who think the U.S. is the best country to be born in, represents a symptom of the fact that the problem of a superpower is its reluctance to see beyond the tip of its own nose. As a Scandinavian I know a lot about your society. You guys don’t really know anything about ours and the reason that’s a unforgivable flaw is that WE have actually figured out how to make a pretty healthy society – you could learn so much more from us and our socialism than we could from your capitalistic imperialism.

In pretty much every list of national traits the Scandinavian countries beat the shit out of the U.S. We have the lowest level of corruption, highest levels of education. We even beat you asses on your own turf of the American dream: social mobility – because we have free education, and are even paid to go to school. We’re the happiest most secure most open, most equal societies of the world.

Try for a minute to imagine observing the American society from the scope of these countries. Try to really imagine how that must feel.

emigration2
givemlharry
06:12 AM on 12/01/2012

I live in Africa. When people say they want to go to America, I tell them they wold be better off going to Canada or any of the Northern European contries or New Zealand or Australia. This study bares out my advice in the past.

America is not the land of opportunity it was in the past. It has been on a slippery slope for the last 30 years and I don’t see that changing any time soon, if ever. If I was 27 instead of 67 I would immigrate. Even with all the problems Africa has, the quality of my life on my limited income is far better here than it could be back home in the US. I just wish I had done it years ago.

James Hoard
05:49 AM on 12/01/2012
Just returned to Australia recently, after living in the UK for 30 years. This is largely subjective survey. People in the UK criticise and complain because they think that is the way to improve things in society, hold politicians to account, etc. In Oz you do that and everybody accuses you of being unpatriotic or ‘running the country down’. Surprise, surprise, all the answers to a survey are optimistic. In the UK even the poorest person in the land will be living in a house built of brick, with a tiled roof and all the electricity wires, telephone, etc delivered to that house underground. Here, they are still building houses from wood with tin roofs. They burn to a cinder at the drop of a light, or blow away in a small gust of wind. Poles and wires litter the townscapes everywhere. In Europe or the UK, tin and wood are good only for beach huts and garden sheds. The country is actually far less democratic than the UK. Looking at what a public transport ticket inspector can do makes one shudder. Tenants rights, property rights, health provision, education, broadcasting, consumer protection – all much inferior to the UK and Europe. 5-10 years behind the times in most things and 30-100 more expensive. Ask them what is so good about Australia, everyone tells you how great the beaches are. Alas, Australia is actually in the opposite direction.
______________________________________________________________
emigration1

There are other indexes which the US does quite well on. If I choose the UN’s Human Development Index, for example, the US ranks 4th:

http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics/

In the Legatum Prosperity Index, the US ranks 12th (10th in 2011)

http://www.prosperity.com/Ranking.aspx

(Population size probably does make a difference – other than the US, the top countries in rankings like these are predominantly smaller countries).

And if the US is in such decline, why does it continue to be BY FAR the most preferred destination for those who wish to permanently migrate from their home countries?

http://www.gallup.com/poll/153992/150-million-adults-worldwide-migrate.aspx

23% of those surveyed wished to migrate to the US, with the next highest being the UK with a mere 7%.

I certainly don’t think the US is “the best in all things,” and I think there are a lot of great places to live in the world – but its stupid to claim that life in the US is so comparatively horrible.

As in
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/28/worlds-best-countries_n_2205270.html
http://www.economist.com/news/21566430-where-be-born-2013-lottery-life?fsrc=scn/tw/te/tr/thelotteryoflife


Live and Work Abroad

 

Pass a Drug Test with Testclear

Proven Drug Testing Solutions

China has overtaken America again: Patents and Liberty 1

 

As the electronics revolution was to the 20th century, the bio medical revolution will be to the 21st century. This time, China intends to be an innovator, not a copier; a leader, not a follower.

The State Intellectual Property Office granted 1.26 million patents in 2012 to domestic and overseas applicants, up 31.25 percent from a year earlier, according to data released by the office Tuesday.The office received 2.05 million patent applications from home and abroad in 2012, an increase of 25.77 percent from a year earlier, office commissioner Tian Lipu said at a conference on intellectual property rights.The office grants patents in three categories: inventions, utility models and designs.The number of invention patents granted by the office jumped 26.1 percent to 217,000 cases last year, Tian said.By the end of 2012, China had 435,000 legitimate invention patents (not including those from Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan), which represent an average of 3.23 invention patents for every 10,000 Chinese.
The government aims to have an average of 3.3 legitimate invention patents per 10,000 people by 2015, according to the 12th Five-Year Plan (2011-2015).
Source:Xinhua

In 2009, two Chinese scientists made a major bio medical breakthrough, hailed worldwide, by cloning a mouse from its skin cell. One is Zeng Fanyi, who earned her MD and PhD degrees at the University of Pennsylvania and is vice-director of Medical Genetics at Shanghai Jiao Tong University. Zeng and her team are now pursuing another pioneering program: mammary gland bio reactors.

 

What’s that? Transgenic animals, conceived artificially with injected, targeted genes that express specific functions. The animals secrete in their breasts pharmaceutical proteins that can be used to cure hereditary diseases. While Zeng’s transgenic procedure works, its commercialization remains unrealized. So Zeng’s research receives ample support from the government, which has been increasing science funding at over 20 percent per year. But bringing new pharmaceuticals to market is a long and perilous process. Only 8 percent of China’s investments have become effective drugs. – says Robert Lawrence Kuhn in “China Daily”

 
According to the Economist :

China has overtaken America again. Its patent office received more applications than any other country’s in 2011. (The numbers were released in December.) But look closer, and the picture is murkier.

In America and Europe, roughly half of patent applications are lodged by foreigners. This used to be true in China, but in the past few years filings by locals have surged to three-quarters of the total (see chart 1). Is this because China has suddenly become more innovative? Or is it because government incentives have prompted people to file lots of iffy patent applications, which the local patent office has a tendency to approve?

There is no reliable way to measure a patent’s value. But one can use a rough-and-ready yardstick: in how many places did the inventors seek a patent for the same technology? If it is a good idea, they will try to patent it in lots of places. If they just want to pocket a Chinese subsidy, they won’t bother.

Data from the UN’s World Intellectual Property Office suggest that some of the apparent spurt in Chinese innovation is illusory. Or at least, patents in China are probably less valuable than those in America or Europe.

Hardly any Chinese inventors seek to patent their ideas abroad. Between 2005 and 2009 fewer than 5% did (see chart 2). In America, the figure was 27%; in Europe, more than 40%. Geeks in the West should not relax, but it is not clear that their Chinese rivals have yet outstripped them.

 
 

As Robert Lawrence Kuhn (an international corporate strategist and investment banker , author of The Man Who Changed China: The Life and Legacy of Jiang Zemin and How China’s Leaders Think) puts it:

China’s leaders call for “indigenous innovation” – the country must develop its own technologies and proprietary products. Yet China’s industrial transformation from assembler-manufacturer to innovator-designer is complex, risky, open to surprise, and will surely take time.
Moreover, innovation requires freedom. To become an increasingly innovative society, China must become an increasingly free society. China must also enforce IPRs and rethink the essence of education.
China’s new leaders face the challenge of innovation.

     The Chinese people are watching.

 

Other concerns include the compulsory licensing of patents. It is unclear how the government will determine that a patent is being misused, or how much patent owners will be paid if they are forced to license their patent.

 
China’s new Patent Law is intended to help accelerate China’s transition to an “innovation economy.” Many companies, however, are concerned that it could also impair their research and development efforts in China, compel the transfer of patented technologies and create further uncertainties in China’s IPR system.

According to Ha-Joon Chang (professor of economics in in the Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge) author of  Kicking Away the Ladder:  How the Economic and Intellectual Histories of Capitalism Have Been Re-Written to Justify Neo-Liberal Capitalism: 

“There is currently great pressure on developing countries to adopt a set of “good policies” and “good institutions” – such as liberalisation of trade and investment and strong patent law – to foster their economic development. When some developing countries show reluctance in adopting them, the proponents of this recipe often find it difficult to understand these countries’ stupidity in not accepting such a tried and tested recipe for development. After all, they argue, these are the policies and the institutions that the developed countries had used in the past in order to become rich. Their belief in their own recommendation is so absolute that in their view it has to be imposed on the developing countries through strong bilateral and multilateral external pressures, even when these countries don’t want them.”

 

As in:

http://www.economist.com/news/business/21569062-valuing-patents?fsrc=scn/fb/wl/pe/valuingpatents

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/bizchina/2012-10/18/content_15828229.htm

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703575004575042691331624302.html

http://en.ce.cn/Business/Macro-economic/201301/09/t20130109_24014996.shtml

Ha-Joon Chang, “Kicking Away the Ladder”, post-autistic economics review, issue no. 15, September 4, 2002, article 3. http://www.btinternet.com/~pae_news/review/issue15.htm

http://www.amcham-shanghai.org/AmChamPortal/Event/EventPrint.aspx?EventId=3678

BE AFRAID; Be Very Afraid… 25 People and Industries That Profit From Fear

People and industries that profit from FEAR

Are you worried about the economy tumbling into oblivion? Scared that some stranger will break into your home? Paranoid about losing your youthful good looks?

Don’t worry. You can buy your peace of mind. Whether it’s a pill, a locking system, or legislation, someone has the perfect solution. Just make sure you pay up to get it.

Indeed, even if the most crucial professionals, like doctors, have their own ways of scaring you into agreeing to their offerings. We look at how 25 everyday people and industries take a bite out of you by playing on your fear.

(Note: I read a lot of sociologist Frank Furedi’s material before writing this post. I was especially influenced by his ideas on religion, wellness, experts, advocacy, and the environment. I want to encourage readers to read more of Furedi’s work, as he’s a true expert on society and fear.)

25. The Security Industry

Image: Roland/Flickr

Security is, by definition, the opposite of fear. It stands to reason that the security industry, which sells products and services that protect your body and assets, makes big bucks of off fear.

The funny thing about security is that not all of it works. How many times have you ignored a car alarm, waiting for the owner to finally turn it off? Or what about home security companies, which profit from installing systems that may make you feel better, but that essentially rely on the taxpayer-funded police for action?

The security industry knows that the more paranoid you feel, the more likely you are to put your hard-earned money towards their products. Let’s just say their interest is not in making you feel better about the world. It just doesn’t sell.

24. The Beauty Industry

Image: sushinecity/Flickr

If a product has the prefix “anti” in front of it, it’s probably fighting a very undesirable condition. Some of these “anti” products, like antifreeze, are quite useful.

Leave it to the beauty industry, however, to create an entire class of products that fight humanity’s most natural process: aging. Anti-aging creams, balms, and sprays will set you back financially, but will they really stop you looking like you’re aging?

Indeed, the beauty industry has a knack for promising a cure for the appearance flaws that petrify some women. From antiwrinkle pillows to anti-cellulite cream, beauty companies would have you believe that the solution to growing older lies in ill-proven products.

What they don’t want to tell you is this. If you really want smoother skin, you’ll have to stay out of the sun and save your money for your plastic surgeon.

23. The Pet Care Industry

Image: wsilver/Flickr

Dogs and cats have been human companions for centuries. Despite the fact that yesterday’s pets lived happily on farms, our 21st-century darlings come with microchips, hypoallergenic organic sleeping pads, smoked BBQ chicken treats, and full insurance.

What would happen if you took all those things away? Most pets would be fine. Yet fear of the unpredictable keeps us buying extras in the name of pet safety and well-being. As long as you believe that Snowball would be traumatized without that lavender aromatherapy shampoo, you’re playing into the system, too.

22. The Anti-Germ Industry

Image: B Rosen/Flickr

A host of companies make the antibacterial soap, antimicrobial pillows, antifungal shoe inserts, and many other products that promise you instant sanitation. Because there’s no formal name for the cottage industry that has emerged around the antibacterial title, we’re going to call it the anti-germ industry.

Recent history has proven that if you sell products that kill germs, you make a killing. Consumers’ paranoia about dirt and germs is so aggravated that things like antibacterial chopsticks actually sell.

Over the years, researchers have discovered that our love of antibacterial products has had negative repercussions like antibiotic-resistant superbugs and an increase in allergies. Expect the PR machine to backlash with a new set of probiotic products, containing human-approved bacteria, in the near future.

21. Stock Market Experts

Buy more gold.
Sell now.
Inflation is coming.
It’s a deflationary cycle.

Browse financial experts’ websites for five minutes, and you’ll probably walk away with a headache. Most of these folks are very smart, very concerned about your money, and very sure that they’re right.

Act now, and for a low monthly fee, you’ll get their premium newsletter, Platinum-level picks, and market prognoses. Don’t wait until you lose all your money in the stock market!

20. The Weight Loss Industry

Image: klf_bdf/Flickr

In the US, we associate attractiveness with lean, fit bodies. If you’re carrying around a few extra pounds, though, that doesn’t mean you’re unattractive. But the weight loss industry would like you to think you are.

If you read into their invisible fear memo, carrying around extra weight will keep you from finding a partner. It will diminish your social status or even outcast you. Nobody will care about you. You simply must combat those extra pounds through diet pills, fad diets, or any of the other myriad offerings of the $50 billion weight loss industry.

The industry’s promise of instant self-esteem will assuage your fears of being an eternal bachelor or perpetual fat girl. You, too, can lose weight for just $99.95 + tax. Come on, sign up now!

19. Banks


Image: The Consumerist/Flickr

What if your credit card gets stolen? What if you lose your job and can’t pay your mortgage? How about if someone steals your ID? Banks offer products to protect you against those worrisome possibilities, however remote they actually are.

In many cases, however, you should be more worried about the bank taking your money than losing it in a more organic fashion. JP Morgan Chase, for example, slips in an extra $2 non-Chase ATM fee every time you pull money out of a non-Chase machine. That’s in addition to whatever the machine charges you. Bank of America snags a $400 processing fee from your credit card before you’ve signed any refinance papers with them, making an instant buck and locking you in without actually promising you anything.

Banks, especially in the US, profit by quietly bilking you. But if you buy their insurance products, you’ll be safe, they pinky-swear that.

18. Consultants

Image: foundphotoslj/Flickr

Even if you went to school to obtain at minimum a Bachelor’s degree, and more than likely have an MBA, your business still may be doomed for failure. Unless you hire a consultant.

It doesn’t matter if your degree is directly related to your multi-million dollar corporation, or if you have years of experience. A consultant who has no knowledge whatsoever about your chosen field holds the key to your success. Follow his or her advice, and your company will be just fine.

Don’t hesitate to hire business help. If you falter in any way on your own, after all, your business will crash and burn like the Hindenburg.

17. Doctors

Image: lanchongzi/Flickr

Without doctors, we’d be screwed. But, thanks to a convoluted for-profit healthcare system, some doctors are now screwing us, too. At some point during their training, these doctors learn that making you better involves potentially unnecessary tests and procedures. Like operating on a patient the first time she sees you for gallstone pain, as mentioned in this excellent New Yorker article. Or running a lucrative private surgery center on the side.

Some doctors–I dare not implicate the profession here–”figure out ways to increase their high-margin work and decrease their low-margin work,” according to the New Yorker. In other words, they act like businesspeople. And it certainly helps when you’re scared enough to trust that every referral, procedure, and medication they give you is, in fact, necessary to make you better.

16. The Children’s Products Industry


Image: Striatic/Flickr

If there’s one demographic we want to keep safe, it’s our babies and children. But we’ve moved beyond that, into what Reader’s Digest writer Lenore Skenazy calls the “Kiddie-Safety Industrial Complex.”

Manufacturers want you to protect your precious bundle with baby kneepads, toddler helmets, and a host of other paranoia-friendly accouterments (see Skenazy’s fantastic article for the full lowdown). While a number of kids’ products are indeed dangerous, advertisers will still play on your most neurotic tendencies to squeeze out those extra consumer dollars.

15. The Environmental Industry


Image: [MP]/Flickr

Did you accidentally spill gasoline as you were filling up? Did you miss the garbage can and unwittingly litter? Thanks for killing the planet, you petroleum-leaking litterbug.

Remember what Paul Ehrlich said: “In ten years all important animal life in the sea will be extinct. Large areas of coastline will have to be evacuated because of the stench of dead fish.” Ehrlich said these words in 1970, but the sense of guilt and dread in the environmental movement remains the same.

Fact is, we do have a lot of environmental problems. They’re impossible to ignore. But there have been improvements, too. Unfortunately, highlighting those doesn’t scare you into supporting any causes. When it comes to the environment, fear just seems to be the proven formula.

Bonus: Capitalism has caught up with environmentalism. You can now buy a host of “green” products that you may or may not need–and that may or may not help the environment, depending on who’s peddling them.

14. The Self-Help Industry 

Image: Desmond Kavanagh/Flickr

Life Coaches, spiritual guides, organizers, oh my! When did we make the shift from managing our own lives to seeking an expert for everything? From creating a home-office filing system to understanding why can’t seem to progress on our jobs to tapping into our inner psyches to figure out we don’t along with our neighbors, there’s an expert for that.

What’s wrong with accepting that you’re not the most organized person? Or that you need to get another degree to move ahead at work, or that your neighbor is nuts?

Somewhere along the line, all our defects were pathologized. And help, my friends, is only a few dollars away, in the form of an expert or book. Just remember–there’s always something else that you can outsource a cure for.

13. Advocacy groups

Image: LaurenV/Flickr

Society’s treatment of children and animals may well be on the upswing, but many advocates would have you believe that it’s all Sturm und Drang, all the time. The idea is to scare you into thinking that their target topic is horribly affecting your life–then giving them money to fix it.

Sociologist Frank Furedi calls these kinds of people “secular moral entrepreneurs.” Here’s how Furedi says they work:

…advocacy groups use ‘surveys’ and ‘research’, rather than the language of good and evil, to claim that a particular problem is getting worse and that, unless Something Is Done, it will engulf the whole of society.

Secular moral entrepreneurs continually seek out new opportunities to promote their cause, in a process described by sociologists as ‘domain expansion’: that is, expanding a widely recognised problem to encompass new issues. For example, widespread public concern about child abuse has encouraged secular moral entrepreneurs to use the language of abuse in relation to other issues, too: some now campaign to prevent ‘elder abuse’, ‘animal abuse’ and what they call ‘peer-to-peer abuse’.

It is now even argued that people who are cruel to animals are likely to be cruel to their family members as well – in other words, one form of abuse begets another. With relentless repetition, and the support of the media, this imaginative linking together of disparate problems can become a kind of conventional wisdom.

So when you hear stats like “one in four US teen girls reported that they met strangers off the Internet,” remember that all those people weren’t sexual predators–but someone would like you to think so.

12. The IT industry

Image: phil_g/Flickr

You’ll do anything to avoid getting a computer virus, won’t you? Thanks to a few bad ones, we’re convinced that horrible things will happen to our computers. Ignorance about all things technical helps fuel the mass hysteria.

Don’t believe it? Have you ever forwarded emails from friends and family about the latest virus that’s going around, regardless whether you’ve verified it on SNOPES? Did you ever bump up your weekly anti-virus download so as not to take any chances? Did you buy all the proposed fixes and still stay up all night in December 1999 anticipating Y2K? Yep, they got you!

11. Fraudsters


Image: Mon1ca/Flickr

Fear impairs your capability to logically assess a situation. Fraudsters know that. That’s why they’re so good at siphoning off money, especially from more vulnerable populations, like seniors.

If you’ve ever fallen for a phishing scam (“Your account has been compromised! Please enter your login and credit card information here so that we can reactivate it!”) or a job that makes you pay upfront for training or materials you never get, then you know what I’m talking about.

The more they make you panic, the more likely you are to cough up your dough. And they succeed, year after year.

10. The Pharmaceutical Industry

Image: JasonTromm/Flickr

Drug companies profit from treating diseases, not curing them. So the more conditions there are to treat, the more drugs a drugmaker can sell. No wonder they spend way more on marketing than on R&D.

By branding and marketing their drugs, then finding new uses for them and rebranding, drugmakers squeeze out as much profit out of a formula as they can. That’s how Prozac became Serafem, a drug marketed for PMS—I mean PMDD. The more conditions a drug company can medicalize, the more potential it has for rebranding its formula.

According to Naked Capitalism’s Yves Smith:

Something like 88% of the so-called “new drug applications” in the US are for alternate uses of existing drugs (so the salesforce can market it legally, doctors are free to prescribe for other uses) OR improved formulations of existing drugs (no joke, stuff like a time released version of Wellbutrin so you only need take it 1X a day). The “improved formulations” type were invariably priced well out of line with the added benefits.

Needless to say, Big Pharma isn’t interested in curing you. It’s interested in keeping you sick—and swallowing its pills.

9. Collections Agencies

Image: meddygarnet/Flickr

If you have ever gone delinquent on paying a credit card or three, you’ve likely received a letter from a collection agency. Their letters, if left ignored, get increasingly irate suggesting everything from “we can settle this with one phone call” to threatening lawsuits. Fearing the latter, you either pay or make arrangements to pay.

Assuming that you’ve accepted that your FICO is going to be seriously compromised, it’s important to know what collection agencies can and can’t do to you. They cannot take you to court and if you write them to tell them to “lay off” they have to, by law. They prey on your fear, ignorance and guilt to get their money. Know your rights!

8. Niche Experts

Image: jurvetson/Flickr

In spite of all the information available to us on the Internet, we seem to have returned to the Dark Ages in terms of relying on some expert to educate us. Whether it’s the severity of the latest flu, the Gulf Oil Spill’s impact on the environment, or even the social ramifications of a child raised by a homosexual couple, anyone with an opinion today is easily deemed an expert.

Anyone can use phrases like “research shows” without a shred of evidence to back up their claims. Granted, some of these so-called experts are actually leaders in their fields, but that’s usually impossible to know upfront. As long as any “expert” has your attention, their game is working.

7. The Wellness Industry

Image: House of Sims/Flickr

The wellness industry focuses on preventing illness instead of fighting it once it has appeared. The industry, which covers everything from massage to supplements to gym classes, plays an important role in keeping everyone fit and well-nourished. But that doesn’t stop the industry from trying scare you into buying their goodies. Sociologist Frank Furedi describes it best:

They preach the message that people’s lives are becoming more and more unhealthy, and thus we need to be ever more vigilant in order to avoid becoming diseased…The premise is that being well is not a natural or normal state – instead it is something people need to work on, something to aspire to and achieve with the help of experts and gurus. Health activists insist that, unless you follow their prescribed patterns of behaviour, your risk of becoming ill will increase.

Once you’re convinced that you need to replace your toxic canola oil with extra-virgin olive oil, you subject yourself to even more potential trickery. But as long as you feel safe and healthy, everything’s okay, right?

6. Prisons


Image: ahisgett/Flickr

We all want our streets to be safe from thugs, miscreants, druggies, and the rest of society’s maladapted. Yet it’s hard to believe that the nearly 2.3 million people in our jailsin mid-2009—roughly a quarter of the world’s prisoners—are all there for good reason.

One in 100 adult Americans is locked up, according to the New York Times. The more afraid you are of criminals, the more likely you are to support political measures that keep this mind-blowing incarceration rate alive. As a result, we jail people for more crimes and longer terms than most other countries, writes the New York Times.

Who profits most from this? Politicians taking a “tough on crime” stance, the companies running private prisons, and the businesses supplying government prisons with goods. A full prison, after all, is a profitable prison.

5. The Gun Industry

Image: Gideon Tsang/Flickr

The recession shows no signs of weakening. People are foreclosing on their homes at a staggering rate. Yet gun sales are through the roof.

Gun sales and fear run on parallel barometers. Shocking footage from Columbine or Virginia Tech seems to make people more likely to stock up on steel protection than ask questions about causes.

Alarmist messages like “(we’re on a) slippery slope toward more Draconian gun restrictions and, ultimately, toward confiscation of all guns” only add fuel to the fire. There’s that fear relationship again: Fearing tougher gun restrictions in the future makes stacking up on semi-automatic weapons seem like the only answer.

4. Insurance companies

Image: OpenSkyMedia/Flickr

Rental car collision insurance. Flight insurance. Contact lens insurance. Death insurance, life insurance, dismemberment insurance, disability insurance, accident insurance…you could insure yourself up the wazoo, if you so desired. But how many of these so-called safety contracts do you really need? If you’re scared of everything, well, you need them all. And you’ll fatten a few bottom lines in the process.

3. Religion

Image: giopuo/Flickr

Religion is a fairly new concept to humans, given how long we’ve been on earth. Yet for two thousand years, religion has been upheld as the ultimate solution to reign in the sinners and strays among us.

Using it to condemn anyone who is not living a “morally fit” existence is quite the norm. From eating pork and drinking (preferably simultaneously) to swearing and “living in sin,” when it comes to religion, people check their own moral compasses at the door. Instead, they choose to listen to those who promise them hell if they continue these sinful acts.

How to redeem yourself? Oh right, tithing and sworn loyalty, plus the occasional potluck.

2. The Media


Image: ShironekoEuro/Flickr

The media mainlines fear for profit. On any given day, the newspapers, websites, and TV shows that make up the MSM (mainstream media) will tell you about baby killers, deadly wild animals, conspiracies, crashes, fires, and terrorists.

Here are some examples of real-life media headlines I found one random afternoon while browsing the Web:

Baby, toddler kidnapped at gunpoint
Coroner: Wild dogs killed Ga. woman, then husband
America’s Soul is Lost and Collapse is Inevitable

Once the media ratchets up your anxiety with scary stories, you’ll keep turning to it for answers, or at least updates. Meanwhile, the media profits off the advertisers, impressions, ratings, pageviews, and all that other soft currency that results from your sustained attention.

1. Politicians

Terrorists. Death panels. Peak oil. Can you read those words without feeling a twinge of fear in your gut? No?

Good. That’s just how politicians want you to feel. When they have you scared, they stand a better chance of passing legislation in line with their own interests. George W. Bush handily used our fear of terrorism to swiftly invade Iraq, despite little premise. Obama is trying to assuage our fear of economic failure by talking of the promise of cap and trade and green jobs, things that are minor in execution. Then there’s that Arizona immigration law.

The more fearful you are, the more likely you are to support laws that you think will soothe that fear. And the merrier politicians get.

As in

http://www.businesspundit.com/25-people-and-industries-that-profit-from-fear/?utm_source=scribol&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=scribol

All Nobel Prizes are political: Parody is redundant

The news of the EU’s prize win is already inspiring more nationalistic rage rather than quelling it. The Guardian reported that the decision was greeted with disbelief by many in Greece, with some saying that their nation is at an economic war partly because of the new Peace Prize winner.

The greatest asset of the Nobel Peace Prize is not its immediate impact but the fact that it celebrates achievements and noble deeds that will outlive our current worries and will set examples for humanity. To use the prize as a political tool is to ruin that invaluable asset.


On Friday, the 27-nation European Union received the Nobel Peace prize for six decades of contributions “to the advancement of peace and reconciliation, democracy and human rights in Europe.”

The $1.2 million, or 930,000 euros, awarded prize comes during the union’s biggest internal crisis since it was established in the 1950s, the Associated Press reported.

Unfortunately, the prize money is a drop in the bucket for Europe’s indebted nations like Greece, Spain and Portugal.

After Alfred Nobel’s death in 1896, his executors discovered that the inventor of dynamite had secretly set aside about 35 million Swedish kronor (about $225 million today) for the creation of five annual prizes to honor those who bestowed the “greatest benefit on mankind” in science, literature and diplomacy.

The Norwegian Nobel Committee decided to award the Nobel Peace Prize for 2012 to the European Union (EU). Although conceding in its press release that “the EU is currently undergoing grave economic difficulties and considerable social unrest,” the Norwegian Nobel Committee rationalized its choice by claiming that it “wishes to focus on what it sees as the EU’s most important result: the successful struggle for peace and reconciliation and for democracy and human rights.

In a speech to the Council of Europe last January, British Prime Minister David Cameron explained the distorted priorities of the EU’s approach to human rights:

“We do have a real problem when it comes to foreign national who threaten our security. The problem today is that you can end up with someone who has no right to live in your country, who you are convinced – and have good reason to be convinced – means to do your country harm. And yet there are circumstances in which you cannot try them, you cannot detain them and you cannot deport them. So having put in place every possible safeguard to ensure that (human rights) rights are not violated, we still cannot fulfill our duty to our law-abiding citizens to protect them.”

The Nobel Committee made a dumb decision in selecting the EU for its 2012 peace prize, squandering an opportunity to use its peace prize for a truly noble purpose. For example, instead they could have selected two of Nigeria’s prominent religious leaders, who were nominated for the prize this year. They are the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Abuja, John Onaiyekan, and the Muslim Sultan of Sokoto, Alhaji Muhammed Sa’ad Abubakar III.

Nigeria is split almost evenly between Muslims and Christians. With the violent Islamic sect, Boko Haram, regularly committing atrocities and threatening to forcibly replace the current constitutional government with a theocracy based on Sharia law, Onaiyekan and the Sultan have been working for peace between the adherents of the two major religions in the country.

The Nobel Committee could have provided a morale boost to the two religious leaders for their courage.  Instead, it settled for an award to the unaccountable transnational bureaucracy that defines the European Union today.

The recipient, which Nobel instructed should be the person who has performed the “best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses,” is determined by a five-member committee appointed by Norway’s Parliament. Nominations are solicited from an undisclosed number of contributors–past winners, prominent institutions–and the winner is decided by a simple majority vote.

Reaction to the committee’s choice has often been anything but peaceful. In 1973, Henry Kissinger and North Vietnam’s Le Duc Tho shared the award for negotiating a cease-fire that ended U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War–despite Kissinger’s role in the secret bombing of Cambodia. (Tho rejected his award, the only person to do so, saying there was no peace in his country.) One Nobel Committee member resigned in protest over Yasser Arafat’s 1994 win, calling the Palestinian leader a “terrorist.” Even Joseph Stalin was nominated twice for his efforts to end World War II (he did not win).

Much has been made of EU  win and the committee’s vague reasoning. Unfortunately, those seeking answers are out of luck: Nobel documents are sealed for 50 years.

 

All Nobel Peace Prizes

The Nobel Peace Prize has been awarded 93 times to 124 Nobel Laureates between 1901 and 2012, 100 individuals and 24 organizations. Since International Committee of the Red Cross was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1917, 1944 and 1963, and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1954 and 1981, 100 individuals and 21 organizations have been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.

Infographic by The Guardian



Click on the links to get more information.

2012
European Union (EU)
2011
Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Leymah Gbowee, Tawakkol Karman
2010
Liu Xiaobo
2009
Barack H. Obama
2008
Martti Ahtisaari
2007
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) , Albert Arnold (Al) Gore Jr.
2006
Muhammad Yunus, Grameen Bank
2005
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) , Mohamed ElBaradei
2004
Wangari Muta Maathai
2003
Shirin Ebadi
2002
Jimmy Carter
2001
United Nations (U.N.) , Kofi Annan
2000
Kim Dae-jung
1999
Médecins Sans Frontières
1998
John Hume, David Trimble
1997
International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL) , Jody Williams
1996
Carlos Filipe Ximenes Belo, José Ramos-Horta
1995
Joseph Rotblat, Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Affairs
1994
Yasser Arafat, Shimon Peres, Yitzhak Rabin
1993
Nelson Mandela, Frederik Willem de Klerk
1992
Rigoberta Menchú Tum
1991
Aung San Suu Kyi
1990
Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev
1989
The 14th Dalai Lama (Tenzin Gyatso)
1988
United Nations Peacekeeping Forces
1987
Oscar Arias Sánchez
1986
Elie Wiesel
1985
International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War
1984
Desmond Mpilo Tutu
1983
Lech Walesa
1982
Alva Myrdal, Alfonso García Robles
1981
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR)
1980
Adolfo Pérez Esquivel
1979
Mother Teresa
1978
Mohamed Anwar al-Sadat, Menachem Begin
1977
Amnesty International
1976
Betty Williams, Mairead Corrigan
1975
Andrei Dmitrievich Sakharov
1974
Seán MacBride, Eisaku Sato
1973
Henry A. Kissinger, Le Duc Tho
1972
No Nobel Prize was awarded this year. The prize money for 1972 was allocated to the Main Fund.
1971
Willy Brandt
1970
Norman E. Borlaug
1969
International Labour Organization (I.L.O.)
1968
René Cassin
1967
No Nobel Prize was awarded this year. The prize money was with 1/3 allocated to the Main Fund and with 2/3 to the Special Fund of this prize section.
1966
No Nobel Prize was awarded this year. The prize money was allocated to the Special Fund of this prize section.
1965
United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF)
1964
Martin Luther King Jr.
1963
Comité international de la Croix Rouge (International Committee of the Red Cross) , Ligue des Sociétés de la Croix-Rouge (League of Red Cross Societies)
1962
Linus Carl Pauling
1961
Dag Hjalmar Agne Carl Hammarskjöld
1960
Albert John Lutuli
1959
Philip J. Noel-Baker
1958
Georges Pire
1957
Lester Bowles Pearson
1956
No Nobel Prize was awarded this year. The prize money was with 1/3 allocated to the Main Fund and with 2/3 to the Special Fund of this prize section.
1955
No Nobel Prize was awarded this year. The prize money was allocated to the Special Fund of this prize section.
1954
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR)
1953
George Catlett Marshall
1952
Albert Schweitzer
1951
Léon Jouhaux
1950
Ralph Bunche
1949
Lord (John) Boyd Orr of Brechin
1948
No Nobel Prize was awarded this year. The prize money was with 1/3 allocated to the Main Fund and with 2/3 to the Special Fund of this prize section.
1947
Friends Service Council (The Quakers) , American Friends Service Committee (The Quakers)
1946
Emily Greene Balch, John Raleigh Mott
1945
Cordell Hull
1944
Comité international de la Croix Rouge (International Committee of the Red Cross)
1943
No Nobel Prize was awarded this year. The prize money was with 1/3 allocated to the Main Fund and with 2/3 to the Special Fund of this prize section.
1942
No Nobel Prize was awarded this year. The prize money was with 1/3 allocated to the Main Fund and with 2/3 to the Special Fund of this prize section.
1941
No Nobel Prize was awarded this year. The prize money was with 1/3 allocated to the Main Fund and with 2/3 to the Special Fund of this prize section.
1940
No Nobel Prize was awarded this year. The prize money was with 1/3 allocated to the Main Fund and with 2/3 to the Special Fund of this prize section.
1939
No Nobel Prize was awarded this year. The prize money was with 1/3 allocated to the Main Fund and with 2/3 to the Special Fund of this prize section.
1938
Office international Nansen pour les Réfugiés (Nansen International Office for Refugees)
1937
Cecil of Chelwood, Viscount (Lord Edgar Algernon Robert Gascoyne Cecil)
1936
Carlos Saavedra Lamas
1935
Carl von Ossietzky
1934
Arthur Henderson
1933
Sir Norman Angell (Ralph Lane)
1932
No Nobel Prize was awarded this year. The prize money was allocated to the Special Fund of this prize section.
1931
Jane Addams, Nicholas Murray Butler
1930
Lars Olof Jonathan (Nathan) Söderblom
1929
Frank Billings Kellogg
1928
No Nobel Prize was awarded this year. The prize money was allocated to the Special Fund of this prize section.
1927
Ferdinand Buisson, Ludwig Quidde
1926
Aristide Briand, Gustav Stresemann
1925
Sir Austen Chamberlain, Charles Gates Dawes
1924
No Nobel Prize was awarded this year. The prize money was allocated to the Special Fund of this prize section.
1923
No Nobel Prize was awarded this year. The prize money was allocated to the Special Fund of this prize section.
1922
Fridtjof Nansen
1921
Karl Hjalmar Branting, Christian Lous Lange
1920
Léon Victor Auguste Bourgeois
1919
Thomas Woodrow Wilson
1918
No Nobel Prize was awarded this year. The prize money was allocated to the Special Fund of this prize section.
1917
Comité international de la Croix Rouge (International Committee of the Red Cross)
1916
No Nobel Prize was awarded this year. The prize money was allocated to the Special Fund of this prize section.
1915
No Nobel Prize was awarded this year. The prize money was allocated to the Special Fund of this prize section.
1914
No Nobel Prize was awarded this year. The prize money was allocated to the Special Fund of this prize section.
1913
Henri La Fontaine
1912
Elihu Root
1911
Tobias Michael Carel Asser, Alfred Hermann Fried
1910
Bureau international permanent de la Paix (Permanent International Peace Bureau)
1909
Auguste Marie François Beernaert, Paul Henri Benjamin Balluet d’Estournelles de Constant, Baron de Constant de Rebecque
1908
Klas Pontus Arnoldson, Fredrik Bajer
1907
Ernesto Teodoro Moneta, Louis Renault
1906
Theodore Roosevelt
1905
Baroness Bertha Sophie Felicita von Suttner, née Countess Kinsky von Chinic und Tettau
1904
Institut de droit international (Institute of International Law)
1903
William Randal Cremer
1902
Élie Ducommun, Charles Albert Gobat
1901
Jean Henry Dunant
1901
Jean Henry Dunant, Frédéric Passy

The Nobel Prizes for Literature and Peace this year have become highly politicized — the former by the Chinese state propaganda machine and Beijing-bashing commentators, and the latter by the committee that awards the coveted awards.

 


StrawberryNET FREE Shipping

As in

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1930515,00.html

http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/50281

http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/post/the-eu-gets-a-nobel-peace-prize/2012/10/14/ad3a7a48-158e-11e2-ba83-a7a396e6b2a7_blog.html

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/business/2012/10/nobel-prize-winners-eurozone-award-controversy/

http://www.chinapost.com.tw/editorial/world-issues/2012/10/16/357714/p2/Nobel-Prizes.htm



Close
Please support the site
By clicking any of these buttons you help our site to get better

Twitter

Facebook

Google+