matetip.com

tips for contemporary living

Tips to be Perfect

Tips to be Perfect

tips1 Diet and exercise

1.Get some sleep.

2.Eat an orange every morning.

3.Be friendly. It will help make you happy.

4.Hope for everything. Expect nothing.

5.Take care of things close to home first. Straighten up your room
before you save the world. Then save the world.
Be nice to people before they have a chance to behave badly.

6.Don’t stay angry about anything for more than a week, but don’t
forget what made you angry. Hold your anger out at arm’s length
and look at it, as if it were a glass ball. Then add it to your glass 
ball collection.

7.Wear comfortable shoes.

8.Do not spend too much time with large groups of people.

9.Plan your day so you never have to rush.

10.Show your appreciation to people who do things for you, even if
you have paid them, even if they do favors you don’t want.


11.After dinner, wash the dishes.

12.Calm down.

13.Don’t expect your children to love you, so they can, if they want 
to.
zenfrog
14.Don’t be too self-critical or too self-congratulatory.

15.Don’t think that progress exists. It doesn’t.

16.Imagine what you would like to see happen, and then don’t do
anything to make it impossible.

17.Forgive your country every once in a while. If that is not 
possible, go to another one.

18.If you feel tired, rest.

19.Don’t be depressed about growing older. It will make you feel 
even older. Which is depressing.

20.Do one thing at a time.


AVG Internet Security Business Edition 2012

21.If you burn your finger, put ice on it immediately. If you bang
your finger with a hammer, hold your hand in the air for 20
minutes. you will be surprised by the curative powers of ice and
gravity.
zen1
22.Do not inhale smoke.

23.Take a deep breath.

24.Do not smart off to a policeman.

25.Be good.

26.Be honest with yourself, diplomatic with others.

27.Do not go crazy a lot. It’s a waste of time. 

28.Drink plenty of water. When asked what you would like to 
drink, say, “Water, please.”

29.Take out the trash.

30.Love life.


31.Use exact change.

32.When there’s shooting in the street, don’t go near the window.

Excerpts from “How to be Perfect” by Ron Padgett, from How to be Perfect. © Coffee House Press, 2007.


38 Tips for Living by the Dalai Lama

 

lake yoga
2. When you lose, don’t lose the lesson.
3. Follow the three Rs:
1. Respect for self 2. Respect for others 3. Responsibility for all your actions.
4. Remember that not getting what you want is sometimes a wonderful stroke of luck.
5. Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
6. Don’t let a little dispute injure a great friendship.
7. When you realize you’ve made a mistake, take immediate steps to correct it.
8. Spend some time alone every day.
9. Open your arms to change, but don’t let go of your values.
10. Remember that silence is sometimes the best answer.
11. Live a good, honourable life. Then when you get older and think back, you’ll be able to enjoy it a second time.
12. A loving atmosphere in your home is the foundation for your life.
13. In disagreements with loved ones, deal only with the current situation.
Don’t bring up the past.
14. Share your knowledge. It’s a way to achieve immortality.
15. Be gentle with the earth.
dalai_lama_visit_featured1-610x343
16. Once a year, go someplace you’ve never been before.
17. Remember that the best relationship is one in which your love for each other exceeds your need for each other.
18. Judge your success by what you had to give up in order to get it.
19. Every day, think as you wake up, today I am fortunate to be alive, I have a precious human life, I am not going to waste it.
20. Use all your energies to develop yourself, to expand your heart out to others; to achieve enlightenment for the benefit of all beings.
21. Have kind thoughts towards others,  don’t  get angry or think badly about others.
22. Know the rules well, so you can break them effectively.
23. Love and compassion are necessities, not luxuries. Without them, humanity cannot survive.
24. Choose to be optimistic, it feels better.
25. Our prime purpose in this life is to help others. And if you can’t help them, at least don’t hurt them.
26. If a problem is fixable, if a situation is such that you can do something about it, then there is no need to worry. If it’s not fixable, then there is no help in worrying. There is no benefit in worrying whatsoever.
27. Remember that sometimes not getting what you want is a wonderful stroke of luck.
28. When we meet real tragedy in life, we can react in two ways–either by losing hope and falling into self-destructive habits, or by using the challenge to find our inner strength.
29. If you want others to be happy, practice compassion. If you want to be happy, practice compassion.
empathy
30. World peace must develop from inner peace. Peace is not just mere absence of violence. Peace is, I think, the manifestation of human compassion.
31. The more you are motivated by Love,
The more Fearless & Free your action will be.
32. A truly compassionate attitude toward others does not change even if they behave negatively or hurt you.
33. All suffering is caused by ignorance. People inflict pain on others in the selfish pursuit of their own happiness or satisfaction
34. We can never obtain peace in the outer world until we make peace with ourselves.
35. Be kind whenever possible. It is always possible.
36. In the practice of tolerance, one’s enemy is the best teacher.
37. It is under the greatest adversity that there exists the greatest potential for doing good, both for oneself and others.
38. Because we all share this planet earth, we have to learn to live in harmony and peace with each other and with nature. This is not just a dream, but a necessity.
 
As in

by 

All Nobel Prizes are political: Parody is redundant

The news of the EU’s prize win is already inspiring more nationalistic rage rather than quelling it. The Guardian reported that the decision was greeted with disbelief by many in Greece, with some saying that their nation is at an economic war partly because of the new Peace Prize winner.

The greatest asset of the Nobel Peace Prize is not its immediate impact but the fact that it celebrates achievements and noble deeds that will outlive our current worries and will set examples for humanity. To use the prize as a political tool is to ruin that invaluable asset.


On Friday, the 27-nation European Union received the Nobel Peace prize for six decades of contributions “to the advancement of peace and reconciliation, democracy and human rights in Europe.”

The $1.2 million, or 930,000 euros, awarded prize comes during the union’s biggest internal crisis since it was established in the 1950s, the Associated Press reported.

Unfortunately, the prize money is a drop in the bucket for Europe’s indebted nations like Greece, Spain and Portugal.

After Alfred Nobel’s death in 1896, his executors discovered that the inventor of dynamite had secretly set aside about 35 million Swedish kronor (about $225 million today) for the creation of five annual prizes to honor those who bestowed the “greatest benefit on mankind” in science, literature and diplomacy.

The Norwegian Nobel Committee decided to award the Nobel Peace Prize for 2012 to the European Union (EU). Although conceding in its press release that “the EU is currently undergoing grave economic difficulties and considerable social unrest,” the Norwegian Nobel Committee rationalized its choice by claiming that it “wishes to focus on what it sees as the EU’s most important result: the successful struggle for peace and reconciliation and for democracy and human rights.

In a speech to the Council of Europe last January, British Prime Minister David Cameron explained the distorted priorities of the EU’s approach to human rights:

“We do have a real problem when it comes to foreign national who threaten our security. The problem today is that you can end up with someone who has no right to live in your country, who you are convinced – and have good reason to be convinced – means to do your country harm. And yet there are circumstances in which you cannot try them, you cannot detain them and you cannot deport them. So having put in place every possible safeguard to ensure that (human rights) rights are not violated, we still cannot fulfill our duty to our law-abiding citizens to protect them.”

The Nobel Committee made a dumb decision in selecting the EU for its 2012 peace prize, squandering an opportunity to use its peace prize for a truly noble purpose. For example, instead they could have selected two of Nigeria’s prominent religious leaders, who were nominated for the prize this year. They are the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Abuja, John Onaiyekan, and the Muslim Sultan of Sokoto, Alhaji Muhammed Sa’ad Abubakar III.

Nigeria is split almost evenly between Muslims and Christians. With the violent Islamic sect, Boko Haram, regularly committing atrocities and threatening to forcibly replace the current constitutional government with a theocracy based on Sharia law, Onaiyekan and the Sultan have been working for peace between the adherents of the two major religions in the country.

The Nobel Committee could have provided a morale boost to the two religious leaders for their courage.  Instead, it settled for an award to the unaccountable transnational bureaucracy that defines the European Union today.

The recipient, which Nobel instructed should be the person who has performed the “best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses,” is determined by a five-member committee appointed by Norway’s Parliament. Nominations are solicited from an undisclosed number of contributors–past winners, prominent institutions–and the winner is decided by a simple majority vote.

Reaction to the committee’s choice has often been anything but peaceful. In 1973, Henry Kissinger and North Vietnam’s Le Duc Tho shared the award for negotiating a cease-fire that ended U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War–despite Kissinger’s role in the secret bombing of Cambodia. (Tho rejected his award, the only person to do so, saying there was no peace in his country.) One Nobel Committee member resigned in protest over Yasser Arafat’s 1994 win, calling the Palestinian leader a “terrorist.” Even Joseph Stalin was nominated twice for his efforts to end World War II (he did not win).

Much has been made of EU  win and the committee’s vague reasoning. Unfortunately, those seeking answers are out of luck: Nobel documents are sealed for 50 years.

 

All Nobel Peace Prizes

The Nobel Peace Prize has been awarded 93 times to 124 Nobel Laureates between 1901 and 2012, 100 individuals and 24 organizations. Since International Committee of the Red Cross was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1917, 1944 and 1963, and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1954 and 1981, 100 individuals and 21 organizations have been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.

Infographic by The Guardian



Click on the links to get more information.

2012
European Union (EU)
2011
Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, Leymah Gbowee, Tawakkol Karman
2010
Liu Xiaobo
2009
Barack H. Obama
2008
Martti Ahtisaari
2007
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) , Albert Arnold (Al) Gore Jr.
2006
Muhammad Yunus, Grameen Bank
2005
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) , Mohamed ElBaradei
2004
Wangari Muta Maathai
2003
Shirin Ebadi
2002
Jimmy Carter
2001
United Nations (U.N.) , Kofi Annan
2000
Kim Dae-jung
1999
Médecins Sans Frontières
1998
John Hume, David Trimble
1997
International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL) , Jody Williams
1996
Carlos Filipe Ximenes Belo, José Ramos-Horta
1995
Joseph Rotblat, Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Affairs
1994
Yasser Arafat, Shimon Peres, Yitzhak Rabin
1993
Nelson Mandela, Frederik Willem de Klerk
1992
Rigoberta Menchú Tum
1991
Aung San Suu Kyi
1990
Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev
1989
The 14th Dalai Lama (Tenzin Gyatso)
1988
United Nations Peacekeeping Forces
1987
Oscar Arias Sánchez
1986
Elie Wiesel
1985
International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War
1984
Desmond Mpilo Tutu
1983
Lech Walesa
1982
Alva Myrdal, Alfonso García Robles
1981
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR)
1980
Adolfo Pérez Esquivel
1979
Mother Teresa
1978
Mohamed Anwar al-Sadat, Menachem Begin
1977
Amnesty International
1976
Betty Williams, Mairead Corrigan
1975
Andrei Dmitrievich Sakharov
1974
Seán MacBride, Eisaku Sato
1973
Henry A. Kissinger, Le Duc Tho
1972
No Nobel Prize was awarded this year. The prize money for 1972 was allocated to the Main Fund.
1971
Willy Brandt
1970
Norman E. Borlaug
1969
International Labour Organization (I.L.O.)
1968
René Cassin
1967
No Nobel Prize was awarded this year. The prize money was with 1/3 allocated to the Main Fund and with 2/3 to the Special Fund of this prize section.
1966
No Nobel Prize was awarded this year. The prize money was allocated to the Special Fund of this prize section.
1965
United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF)
1964
Martin Luther King Jr.
1963
Comité international de la Croix Rouge (International Committee of the Red Cross) , Ligue des Sociétés de la Croix-Rouge (League of Red Cross Societies)
1962
Linus Carl Pauling
1961
Dag Hjalmar Agne Carl Hammarskjöld
1960
Albert John Lutuli
1959
Philip J. Noel-Baker
1958
Georges Pire
1957
Lester Bowles Pearson
1956
No Nobel Prize was awarded this year. The prize money was with 1/3 allocated to the Main Fund and with 2/3 to the Special Fund of this prize section.
1955
No Nobel Prize was awarded this year. The prize money was allocated to the Special Fund of this prize section.
1954
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR)
1953
George Catlett Marshall
1952
Albert Schweitzer
1951
Léon Jouhaux
1950
Ralph Bunche
1949
Lord (John) Boyd Orr of Brechin
1948
No Nobel Prize was awarded this year. The prize money was with 1/3 allocated to the Main Fund and with 2/3 to the Special Fund of this prize section.
1947
Friends Service Council (The Quakers) , American Friends Service Committee (The Quakers)
1946
Emily Greene Balch, John Raleigh Mott
1945
Cordell Hull
1944
Comité international de la Croix Rouge (International Committee of the Red Cross)
1943
No Nobel Prize was awarded this year. The prize money was with 1/3 allocated to the Main Fund and with 2/3 to the Special Fund of this prize section.
1942
No Nobel Prize was awarded this year. The prize money was with 1/3 allocated to the Main Fund and with 2/3 to the Special Fund of this prize section.
1941
No Nobel Prize was awarded this year. The prize money was with 1/3 allocated to the Main Fund and with 2/3 to the Special Fund of this prize section.
1940
No Nobel Prize was awarded this year. The prize money was with 1/3 allocated to the Main Fund and with 2/3 to the Special Fund of this prize section.
1939
No Nobel Prize was awarded this year. The prize money was with 1/3 allocated to the Main Fund and with 2/3 to the Special Fund of this prize section.
1938
Office international Nansen pour les Réfugiés (Nansen International Office for Refugees)
1937
Cecil of Chelwood, Viscount (Lord Edgar Algernon Robert Gascoyne Cecil)
1936
Carlos Saavedra Lamas
1935
Carl von Ossietzky
1934
Arthur Henderson
1933
Sir Norman Angell (Ralph Lane)
1932
No Nobel Prize was awarded this year. The prize money was allocated to the Special Fund of this prize section.
1931
Jane Addams, Nicholas Murray Butler
1930
Lars Olof Jonathan (Nathan) Söderblom
1929
Frank Billings Kellogg
1928
No Nobel Prize was awarded this year. The prize money was allocated to the Special Fund of this prize section.
1927
Ferdinand Buisson, Ludwig Quidde
1926
Aristide Briand, Gustav Stresemann
1925
Sir Austen Chamberlain, Charles Gates Dawes
1924
No Nobel Prize was awarded this year. The prize money was allocated to the Special Fund of this prize section.
1923
No Nobel Prize was awarded this year. The prize money was allocated to the Special Fund of this prize section.
1922
Fridtjof Nansen
1921
Karl Hjalmar Branting, Christian Lous Lange
1920
Léon Victor Auguste Bourgeois
1919
Thomas Woodrow Wilson
1918
No Nobel Prize was awarded this year. The prize money was allocated to the Special Fund of this prize section.
1917
Comité international de la Croix Rouge (International Committee of the Red Cross)
1916
No Nobel Prize was awarded this year. The prize money was allocated to the Special Fund of this prize section.
1915
No Nobel Prize was awarded this year. The prize money was allocated to the Special Fund of this prize section.
1914
No Nobel Prize was awarded this year. The prize money was allocated to the Special Fund of this prize section.
1913
Henri La Fontaine
1912
Elihu Root
1911
Tobias Michael Carel Asser, Alfred Hermann Fried
1910
Bureau international permanent de la Paix (Permanent International Peace Bureau)
1909
Auguste Marie François Beernaert, Paul Henri Benjamin Balluet d’Estournelles de Constant, Baron de Constant de Rebecque
1908
Klas Pontus Arnoldson, Fredrik Bajer
1907
Ernesto Teodoro Moneta, Louis Renault
1906
Theodore Roosevelt
1905
Baroness Bertha Sophie Felicita von Suttner, née Countess Kinsky von Chinic und Tettau
1904
Institut de droit international (Institute of International Law)
1903
William Randal Cremer
1902
Élie Ducommun, Charles Albert Gobat
1901
Jean Henry Dunant
1901
Jean Henry Dunant, Frédéric Passy

The Nobel Prizes for Literature and Peace this year have become highly politicized — the former by the Chinese state propaganda machine and Beijing-bashing commentators, and the latter by the committee that awards the coveted awards.

 


StrawberryNET FREE Shipping

As in

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1930515,00.html

http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/50281

http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/post/the-eu-gets-a-nobel-peace-prize/2012/10/14/ad3a7a48-158e-11e2-ba83-a7a396e6b2a7_blog.html

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/business/2012/10/nobel-prize-winners-eurozone-award-controversy/

http://www.chinapost.com.tw/editorial/world-issues/2012/10/16/357714/p2/Nobel-Prizes.htm



Why a pet if you can get a women ?

(Sexuality Tips for Men)  

“Not all pussy is the same, in case you haven’t noticed. The four-legged variety will assuredly take priority over the two-legged any day of the week and if you’re a man who owns a mouser, I’m sure you’ll agree with me – pussycats rule!”  according to Sam Phillips

 A new AP-Petside poll found that, when forced to choose, as many as 14 percent of current pet owners would tell their spouses or significant others to hit the road rather than ditch their pets. When it comes to unmarried pet owners, the numbers skew slightly more in favor of pets — 25 percent.

Still, throngs of pet lovers appear to value their relationships with pets over people. We asked readers what they thought, and after talking to a number of pet owners about this deeply philosophical question, we too found that a surprising number of people would unequivocally choose the company of Fido or Fluffy over the prospect of romantic fulfillment. However, their reasons may not be exactly what you think:
- You cannot hold a conversation with a cat
-A cat cannot contribute to the household finances
-A cat cannot have sex with you
-A cat cannot take care of you in times of dire need
-She’s a keeper, I knew that the first time we met. She barks.


What is the best way to touch a woman? It depends on the woman. I’m going to explain EXACTLY what you need to know to figure it out for your woman.
There are a few important keys to touching that can let her know, INSTANTLY that you know exactly what you are doing– and get her powerfully aroused.
The first thing you should know, if you don’t already, is that women LOVE to be touched. Touch is very important to all humans, but it is, generally, much more important to women, and they respond very strongly to touch. It is a powerful reward to a woman when you touch her, and it can instantly make her feel great. Now, of course, some women are more reserved about it…some are more formal and are not comfortable feeling such good feelings with someone until they know them well. Some women are just closed off and don’t like anyone to enter their space, and even in a relationship, they resist having another person touch them so easily…And some women simply do not like being touched. They find itunpleasant and they recoil from it. But the truth is, women in those last two categories (ABSOLUTELY those in the last one) have had some trauma in their lives, probably child sexual abuse, that has damaged them to the extent that they can’t accept this natural and beautiful form of shared pleasure. That’s a sad truth of the world.

“He’s my perfect pint-sized companion and as far as I’m concerned, “Man!” takes priority over the current dick in my bed. At the end of the day, I’ll always remember the times [insert douche's name here] wasn’t there for me, and Mr. Man was. Note to future guys I’m banging: Don’t make me chose between you and my fur-child. You will lose.”  Sam Phillips

Sensual touching is an art that you should definitely spend some time mastering — because it will be incredibly rewarding to both you and the woman in your life.

Touch her more
.

However much you are already touching your girlfriend, wife, or lover…you can do it more often. I can’t emphasize enough how much of an emotional connection and bond can be formed by this simple action. Women link many feelings of sexuality,love, and trust with the sensations that are aroused in them when a man puts his hands on her.It can make her feel both sexually excited and safe at the same time. It can also make her body release certain chemicals into her blood that make her feel more attraction to and more comfort with the man that she is with.

How’s that for the simplest tip ever?

Try it out. I promise that it is as effective as it is simple.
Look into her eyes.Well, here’s one that’s even more simple…but again…it’s so much more powerful than it sounds. When you are putting your hand on her, whether you are caressing or squeezing…or petting or holding or any other kind of touching…Look into her eyes as you are doing it.You will find that if you hold eye contact with a woman — even if she looks down for a moment — she will be drawn into your gaze and that you can hold her there. This will add an amazing amount of emotional intensity to your touch. She will feel it deeply in her body.You may think, heck, I already look at her when I touch her…But just try this — try being aware of intentionally holding her eye contact as you touch her.I think you will find that it makes a very big difference.

Try touching her in new ways. There are particular types of touching that women find more romantic, more sensual, and more arousing than others. And, of course, since all women are different, you’re going to have to do some experimenting to find out what the woman in your life responds to most. The key is to really tune in to her and notice how she is responding. That tuning in or “Paying Attention” that I always talk about, is actually the really important part of this tip…But here are a few ways you should try touching her — most women respond very positively towards ALL of them.Pay attention to see which ones your girl goes for:Use the very tips of your fingers and run them very, very lightly, so that it is almost a tickle, anywhere (or everywhere) on her skin.
Stroke her gently, but not tentatively with the entire face of your hand. Try running it up her back, her neck, her legs, arms, or the side of her face.
Just hold her firmly. This can be such a powerful feeling for a woman. Just place your hand on her shoulder, the back of her neck, her thigh, arm, or hand…and just hold her. Let her feel your masculine strength, but don’t, obviously, hurt her. If you do this right, she should feel the tenderness and protectiveness behind your touch.
Cup her with your hand, and stroke gently with your thumb…This combines the first idea of gentle finger tips with the last one of holding her firmly…
I particularly like to hold the back of her neck and then gently stroke her cheek with my thumb…while looking into her eyes. Also try holding the back of her head and stroking her temple, or hold her arm and stroke her shoulder, or her thigh and stroke her knee.
Add eye contact to all of these and she will melt.
Pet her hair. I have never met a woman who does not enjoy having her hair stroked. For girls with straight hair, you can let your fingers run through it. If she has curly hair, just pet, so that you don’t get stuck and start yanking on her knots!

To really send her into orbit, start at her neck and use your fingers to pet upwards into her hair along her scalp. You can bring a woman very close to orgasm with this one.

The basic truth is: A woman can FEEL, not just the physical sensation of your hand on her skin, but also she can FEEL the emotional content of your touch.

I know this sounds a little bit “out there,” but again, as always, I challenge you to TRY it before you dismiss it because this is really an incredibly powerful truth. When you touch a woman while thinking sexual thoughts about her, and when you focus that intent into your touch, she will FEEL it very strongly… and her body will respond to it. That sexual energywill flow from you and into her.
Likewise, when you feel tender feelings of attraction and protectiveness for your woman, and you stroke her hair, it makes her feel loved and safe. And there is nothing that will provide you both with a more amazing night of mind-melting sex than when the woman in your arms feels loved and safe.
If you are in a relationship, you will be even more amazed at the positive changes that just a tiny bit of information can cause. You can go to a marriage counselor, or talk to a therapist, or read books on “communicating” better, but there is NOTHING in my experience that improves a relationship more or strengthens the bond between a man and a woman than touch and sex.
And if nothing works, get a pet.

Required Tools:
Your hands
Wife or Girlfriend
An open mind

As in
www.howtodothings.com/family-relationships/how-to-touch-a-woman-to-drive-her-wild

http://www.pawnation.com/2011/01/27/would-you-choose-your-pet-over-your-spouse/

http://blogs.laweekly.com/afterdark/2011/09/11_tips_for_dating_women_with.php

http://www.utexas.edu/news/2010/01/13/personality_dogs_cats/

Hans Bethe: Prophet of Energy

Hans Bethe

Hans Albrecht Bethe was born in Strasbourg, Alsace-Lorraine, on July 2 1906. He attended the Gymnasium in Frankfurt from 1915 to 1924. He then studied at the University of Frankfurt for two years, and at Munich for two and one half years, taking his Ph. D. in theoretical physics with Professor Arnold Sommerfeld in July 1928.

He then was an Instructor in physics at Frankfurt and at Stuttgart for one semester each. From fall 1929 to fall 1933 his headquarters were the University of Munich where he became Privatdozent in May 1930. During this time he had a travel fellowship of the International Education Board to go to Cambridge, England, in the fall of 1930, and to Rome in the spring terms of 1931 and 1932. In the winter semester of 1932-1933,he held a position as Acting Assistant Professor at the University of Tubingen which he lost due to the advent of the Nazi regime in Germany.

Bethe emigrated to England in October 1933 where he held a temporary position as Lecturer at the University of Manchester for the year 1933-1934, and a fellowship at the University of Bristol in the fall of 1934. In February 1935 he was appointed Assistant Professor at Cornell University, Ithaca, N. Y. U.S.A., then promoted to Professor in the summer of 1937. He has stayed there ever since, except for sabbatical leaves and for an absence during World War II. His war work took him first to the Radiation Laboratory at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, working on microwave radar, and then to the Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory which was engaged in assembling the first atomic bomb. He returned to Los Alamos for half a year in 1952. Two of his sabbatical leaves were spent at Columbia University, one at the University of Cambridge, and one at CERN and Copenhagen.

Bethe’s main work is concerned with the theory of atomic nuclei. Together with Peierls, he developed a theory of the deuteron in 1934 which he extended in 1949. He resolved some contradictions in the nuclear mass scale in 1935. He studied the theory of nuclear reactions in 1935-1938, predicting many reaction cross sections. In connection with this work, he developed Bohr’s theory of the compound nucleus in a more quantitative fashion. This work and also the existing knowledge on nuclear theory and experimental results, was summarized in three articles in the Reviews of Modern Physics which for many years served as a textbook for nuclear physicists.

His work on nuclear reactions led Bethe to the discovery of the reactions which supply the energy in the stars. The most important nuclear reaction in the brilliant stars is the carbon-nitrogen cycle, while the sun and fainter stars use mostly the proton-proton reaction. Bethe’s main achievement in this connection was the exclusion of other possible nuclear reactions. The Nobel Prize was given for this work, as well as his work on nuclear reactions in general.

In 1955 Bethe returned to the theory of nuclei, emphasizing a different phase. He has worked since then on the theory of nuclear matter whose aim it is to explain the properties of atomic nuclei in terms of the forces acting between nucleons.

Before his work on nuclear physics, Bethe’s main attention was given to atomic physics and collision theory. On the former subject, he wrote a review article inHandbuch der Physik in which he filled in the gaps of the existing knowledge, and which is still up-to-date. In collision theory, he developed a simple and powerful theory of inelastic collisions between fast particles and atoms which he has used to determine the stopping power of matter for fast charged particles, thus providing a tool to nuclear physicists. Turning to more energetic collisions, he calculated with Heitler the bremsstrahlung emitted by relativistic electrons, and the production of electron pairs by high energy gamma rays.

Bethe also did some work on solid-state theory. He discussed the splitting of atomic energy levels when an atom is inserted into a crystal, he did some work on the theory of metals, and especially he developed a theory of the order and disorder in alloys.

In 1947, Bethe was the first to explain the Lamb-shift in the hydrogen spectrum, and he thus laid the foundation for the modern development of quantum electrodynamics. Later on, he worked with a large number of collaborators on the scattering of pi mesons and on their production by electromagnetic radiation.

Bethe is married to the daughter of P.P. Ewald, the well-known X-ray physicist. They have two children, Henry and Monica.

From Nobel Lectures, Physics 1963-1970, Elsevier Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1972

This autobiography/biography was written at the time of the award and first published in the book series Les Prix Nobel. It was later edited and republished inNobel Lectures. To cite this document, always state the source as shown above.

 

Hans Bethe died on March 6, 2005.

 

Copyright © The Nobel Foundation 1967

 

Hans Bethe

Hans Bethe’s arrival at Cornell University as a refugee from Nazi Germany, at age 28 in 1935, launched the Department of Physics into the top rank. It was at Cornell, before World War II, that Bethe published his famous reviews of nuclear physics, and conducted his groundbreaking work on the theory of energy production in stars for which he won the Nobel Prize in 1967.

During the war, Bethe was a key figure on the Manhattan Project as head of the theoretical physics division. After the war, he brought some of the most outstanding young physicists from Los Alamos to Cornell, in particular, Richard Feynman and Robert Wilson. Under their leadership, Cornell moved into what is now called high energy elementary particle physics, a field in which Cornell remains on the cutting edge. That Hans Bethe has devoted virtually his whole career to Cornell has been of inestimable value to the Department and to the University.

Hans Bethe was born in 1906 in Strasbourg, Germany. He attended the University of Munich, studying with Arnold Sommerfeld, and after receiving his degree in 1928, taught at Frankfurt, Stuttgart and Munich. In 1930 and 1931, he received fellowships first to Cambridge and then to Rome where he worked with Enrico Fermi.

Bethe’s career spans the evolution of nuclear physics as we know it today. He has made contributions to almost all phases of the exploration of nuclear interactions and nuclear forces, but his scientific accomplishments go far beyond this. He produced the first major paper on the theory of order-disorder transitions in alloys, and his 1947 calculation of the Lamb shift paved the way for the revolution in quantum electrodynamics.

In the decade following World War II, Bethe and Feynman and their students played a central role in developing quantum electrodynamics, work for which Feynman shared the Nobel Prize. From 1945, until his retirement from the Cornell faculty in 1975, Bethe trained and inspired a large number of graduate students. Many have gone on to become internationally known scientists, among them Freeman Dyson. Bethe and his co-workers published important work across the whole spectrum of physics. Even today, in his nineties, his unique mastery of such diverse subjects as thermonuclear processes, shock waves and neutrino reactions have kept Bethe at the forefront of research in astrophysics.

Bethe’s impact transcends the Cornell Physics Department. The distinction of astronomy at Cornell owes much to Bethe’s inspiration and initiatives. He has been an advisor to several United States presidents on national security policy and, since World War II, has played a leading role in the public debate about nuclear weapons, defense policy and nuclear power. He was one of the founders of the Federation of Atomic Scientists and was a member of the original Board of Directors of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.

In his public role, Bethe’s position has been that of a responsible scientist and a man of conscience eager to contribute his special knowledge to the public discussion of the great issues of our time. Hans Bethe is a remarkable combination of a truly great scientist who has also made major contributions in the public service of his nation.

intro video thumbnail As Introduction
12 minutes
Large Video (28 MB)
Small Video (5 MB)
Audio Only (3 MB)
lecture 1 video thumbnail Lecture 1
49 minutes
Large Video (102 MB)
Small Video (12 MB)
Audio Only (4 MB)
lecture 2 video thumbnail Lecture 2
43 minutes
Large Video (88 MB)
Small Video (11 MB)
Audio Only (4 MB)
lecture 3 video thumbnail Lecture 3
49 minutes
Large Video (102 MB)
Small Video (12 MB)
Audio Only (4 MB)
outro video thumbnail Appreciation
20 minutes
Large Video (46 MB)
Small Video (8 MB)
Audio Only (4 MB)
Three Lectures by Hans BetheIN 1999, legendary theoretical physicist Hans Bethe delivered three lectures on quantum theory to his neighbors at the Kendal of Ithaca retirement community (near Cornell University). Given by Professor Bethe at age 93, the lectures are presented here as QuickTime videos synchronized with slides of his talking points and archival material.

Intended for an audience of Professor Bethe’s neighbors at Kendal, the lectures hold appeal for experts and non-experts alike. The presentation makes use of limited mathematics while focusing on the personal and historical perspectives of one of the principal architects of quantum theory whose career in physics spans 75 years.

A video introduction and appreciation are provided by Professor Silvan S. Schweber, the physicist and science historian who is Professor Bethe’s biographer, and Edwin E. Salpeter, the J. G. White Distinguished Professor of Physical Science Emeritus at Cornell, who was a post-doctoral student of Professor Bethe.

About Hans Bethe
Related Reading

Help with Videos

QuickTime logo

Related Reading

Hans Bethe’s publications span over 75 years and an incredible array of topics in physics, astrophysics, nuclear energy, arms control, and science policy. This page offers just a few starting points for those interested in learning about Professor Bethe and his profound influence as one of the great scientists of the twentieth century. Readers interested in learning more about quantum theory will readily find technical and popular references in libraries, bookstores, and online.

Web Pages

Nobel Prize biography, 1967
Includes the presentation speech and other resources

Hans Bethe Celebrates 60 Years at Cornell,” 1995
Several articles by Cornell University News Service

A Tribute to Hans Albrecht Bethe,” 1995
Originally published by Cornell Magazine

Writing the Biography of a Living Scientist: Hans Bethe,” 1995
Paper given by Silvan Schweber at the Pauling Symposium

Bruce Medalist page and bibliography, 2001
Awarded for lifetime contributions to astronomy

Videos

I Can Do That: Hans Bethe’s First 60 Years at Cornell,” 1995
Produced at Cornell University, available online. (After clicking the link, scroll down to the bottom of the page. Click “View/Open” to launch the RealMedia video.)

“An Evening with Hans Bethe: the German Atomic Bomb Project,” 1993
Produced at Cornell University, available at Cornell Library

Books

Schweber, Silvan S., In the Shadow of the Bomb: Bethe, Oppenheimer, and the Moral Responsibility of the Scientist (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2000).

Bernstein, Jeremy, Prophet of Energy: Hans Bethe (Basic Books, 1980; Elsevier-Dutton, NY, 1981).

Bethe, H.A., et. al., From a Life of Physics (World Scientific Publishing Co., Singapore, 1989).

Bethe, Hans A., The Road from Los Alamos, [Masters of Modern Physics series] (American Inst. of Physics, NY, 1991).

As in

bethe.cornell.edu/

http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1967/bethe-bio.html

Close
Please support the site
By clicking any of these buttons you help our site to get better

Twitter

Facebook

Google+